Architecting On-Prem GPU Fleets for Autonomous Desktop AI Agents

Hook: Why desktop AI agents force you to rethink on‑prem GPU architecture

low-latency, local access to powerful accelerators while preserving data confidentiality and administrative control. For enterprise IT and platform engineers in 2026, that means designing an on‑prem GPU pooling architecture that supports NVLink‑aware multi‑GPU jobs, enforces isolation, and produces accurate billing and showback. This guide walks you through an operational blueprint — topology discovery, scheduler design, runtime isolation, security controls, and billing — that makes desktop AI agents practical in regulated, cost‑sensitive environments.

The 2026 context: why this matters now

Two 2026 trends are driving urgency:

• Desktop autonomous agents: Tools like Anthropic's Cowork (Jan 2026) demonstrate a new wave of desktop agents that need direct access to files and may request on‑prem GPUs for private inference and synthesis. These agents prioritize latency and local data control over public cloud convenience.
• NVLink Fusion and heterogeneous silicon: SiFive and other vendors announced NVLink Fusion integration with RISC‑V and edge silicon in late 2025–early 2026, accelerating designs that treat NVLink domains as first‑class resources. If your applications need high cross‑GPU bandwidth, you must be NVLink‑aware.

Combine those trends and you have a deployment problem: how to let many desktops share a pool of on‑prem GPUs while preserving performance, isolation, and transparent costs.

High‑level architecture: the GPU Pooling Stack

At a glance, build the system in layers so responsibilities are clear:

1. Inventory & Topology — hardware discovery, NVLink domains, MIG capability
2. Resource Broker — NVLink‑aware scheduler that allocates GPUs or MIG instances
3. Runtime & Isolation — containers/VMs with vGPUs, MIG, or MPS for sharing
4. Network & Gateway — secure desktop-to‑GPU tunnels and session brokering
5. Telemetry & Billing — per‑session accounting, DCGM metrics, showback/chargeback
6. Security & Compliance — identity, secrets, network segmentation, and optional TEEs

Why NVLink awareness matters

NVLink provides high‑bandwidth, low‑latency peer links between GPUs. Many desktop AI models (multi‑GPU attention, larger context models, runtime parallelism) exploit NVLink for fast inter‑GPU tensor exchange. Allocating GPUs from different NVLink islands will function, but performance falls dramatically and can break latency assumptions of interactive agents. A good broker must map application requirements to NVLink topologies and respect affinity constraints.

Step 1 — Inventory: map every NVLink domain

Practical actions:

• Run nvidia‑smi topo -m or use NVIDIA NVML to capture peer‑to‑peer and NVLink connectivity. Persist results into a topology DB.
• Tag nodes with NVLink domain IDs and per‑GPU capabilities (MIG support, vGPU support, HBM size, compute capability).
• Identify NVLink islands — groups of GPUs with full NVLink mesh. Treat each island as an atomic allocation when an NVLink‑level allocation is requested.

Example command:

# On each GPU host
nvidia-smi topo -m
# Script the output to your CMDB and parse NVLink groups

Step 2 — Resource model and scheduling

Design a resource model that exposes two types of resources to clients:

• Exclusive GPU(s) with NVLink affinity — allocate full GPUs or whole NVLink islands when agents require multi‑GPU, NVLink performance.
• Shared accelerators — use MIG, NVIDIA vGPU, or MPS to carve capacity for many lightweight agents.

NVLink‑aware scheduler design

Options for implementation:

• Kubernetes with a scheduler extender or custom scheduler plugin that understands GPU topology. Use node labels and custom resources (CRDs) for NVLink groups and advertise them via the device plugin.
• Slurm or Nomad for scale where batch and interactive workloads mix; both support generic resource tags (gres) and topology constraints.
• A dedicated Broker service (recommended) that accepts desktop agent requests and maps them to the right node and allocation type.

Scheduler logic should:

1. Match latency vs throughput profile of the agent (interactive small batches vs heavy multi‑GPU inference).
2. Respect NVLink affinity — prefer allocations within the same island.
3. Enforce isolation level and cost tier (premium exclusive vs discounted shared).
4. Support preemption and graceful reclaim for long‑running sessions.

Example: scheduler policy

When a desktop agent requests GPU access, include fields:

• gpu_count: 1 | 2 | 4
• nvlink_required: boolean
• isolation: exclusive | shared
• max_latency_ms: number
• billing_profile: interactive | batch

The broker computes candidates by querying the topology DB and filters nodes where nvlink_required implies the requested GPUs must belong to the same NVLink island.

Step 3 — Isolation and runtime choices

For desktop AI, isolation must balance performance and tenancy. The common patterns:

• Full GPU exclusive: Highest performance, easiest security boundary. Use containerd or a lightweight VM (gVMI) to run the agent runtime. Good for LLMs that require full GPU memory and NVLink.
• MIG: Partition GPUs into fixed slices. Best for multiple small inference workloads. Monitor noisy neighbor risk and enforce limits.
• vGPU (NVIDIA vGPU): Vendor licensed option for GUI/desktop virtualization and fine‑grained sharing. Suitable where vendor support and licensing are acceptable.
• MPS and API‑level multiplexing: NVIDIA Multi‑Process Service can improve utilization for many small kernels, but it offers weaker isolation.

Operational recommendations:

• Use exclusive allocations for any desktop agent handling sensitive files or requiring NVLink.
• Use MIG for high‑density lightweight inference with strict monitoring and automatic rebalancing.
• When using vGPU, integrate license tracking into billing.

Step 4 — Secure desktop access: gateway, tokens, tunnelling

Desktop agents must not receive raw access to GPU hosts. Instead, implement a secure session flow:

1. Desktop agent authenticates via OIDC (enterprise IdP) to the Broker. Use short‑lived tokens tied to the session and tenant.
2. The Broker allocates resources and issues a session credential scoped to that runtime.
3. Use an encrypted, authenticated tunnel for data and control. Options: mTLS over WebSocket, SSH multiplexing, or a lightweight sidecar proxy on the GPU host. For ultra‑low latency in LANs prefer mTLS and keep roundtrips minimal.
4. Network rules: restrict egress from GPU hosts to only required services (model registries, secrets service) and pepper with allowlists for desktop subnet ranges.

Practical detail: use SPIFFE/SPIRE to manage workload identities for runtime processes. That avoids embedding long‑lived credentials in desktop agents and simplifies revocation.

Step 5 — Telemetry, metering and billing

Billing is essential for adoption. Desktop teams must see predictable costs. Implement per‑session accounting:

• Use NVIDIA DCGM and NVIDIA‑prometheus exporters to capture GPU utilization, memory, power, and MIG slice assignment.
• Correlate session tokens from the Broker with DCGM telemetry to compute GPU‑seconds and weighted usage (e.g., HBM GB × GPU‑hours).
• Include NVLink usage metrics where possible (peer‑to‑peer bandwidth counters) to justify premium billing for NVLink allocations.
• Emit events into a time‑series DB (Prometheus + Thanos) and a billing pipeline that computes daily/weekly invoices or showback dashboards.

Example metric pipeline:

1. Broker assigns session S to node N and GPU IDs {0,1}.
2. DCGM exports per‑GPU metrics with labels node=N, gpu_id=0, session=S.
3. Billing job computes sum(session=S, gpu_seconds) and tags nvlink_affinity=true if GPUs are in same island.
4. Charge = base_hour_rate × gpu_hours × nvlink_multiplier + model_inference_costs.

Showback vs Chargeback

Start with showback (visibility) to gain trust; move to chargeback when teams accept the model. Leverage Kubernetes ResourceQuota for enforcement once budgets are defined.

Step 6 — Security and compliance hardening

Key controls:

• Identity & least privilege: Desktop agents obtain ephemeral tokens. The Broker only issues tokens inspected by the host runtime.
• Secrets management: Mount models and keys at runtime from a secret store (HashiCorp Vault, AWS Nitro-like secrets) with access logs.
• Network microsegmentation: Use VLANs or an overlay (Cilium, Calico) and enforce egress rules from GPU hosts.
• Audit & provenance: Log model binary checksums, runtime images, and session command metadata for compliance.
• Optional TEEs: For maximum confidentiality, run models inside TEEs (Intel TDX, AMD SEV) and use attestation as proof of environment integrity.
• DPU offload: Use BlueField/DPUs to enforce security in hardware and to offload traffic filtering, helping reduce host TCB.

Operational recipes: commands and configuration snippets

Discover NVLink topology with NVML

python3 -c "from pynvml import *; nvmlInit();
for i in range(nvmlDeviceGetCount()):
  h = nvmlDeviceGetHandleByIndex(i)
  name = nvmlDeviceGetName(h)
  print(i, name)
  for j in range(nvmlDeviceGetCount()):
    if i==j: continue
    p2p = nvmlDeviceGetP2PStatus(h, nvmlDeviceGetHandleByIndex(j))
    if p2p==NVML_P2P_LINK_ENABLED:
      print('  linked to', j)
"

Labeling nodes in Kubernetes

# Example: label node with nvlink-island=hostA:0-3
kubectl label node gpu-node-01 nvlink-island=hostA-0-3
# Create a CRD gpuislands and expose to scheduler extender

Monitoring and billing tags

# Set environment variable in job runtime
export SESSION_ID=abc123
# DCGM exporter will include SESSION_ID label, which your billing pipeline aggregates

Scaling patterns and cost optimization

Practical scaling tips:

• Tier hardware: Mix H100/NVIDIA 8000 class for heavy models and cheaper A30/A10 for inference. Tag hardware with performance and cost multipliers.
• Autoscale broker pool: Use cold/idle hosts for batch tasks and keep a hot pool for interactive agents. Warm nodes by staging commonly used models on NVMe or local NFS caches.
• Model placement: Place large models on nodes with NVLink islands large enough to hold them or support sharded weights (tensor parallelism).
• Preemption & graceful migration: Offer both ephemeral preemptible instances for low‑cost experiments and reserved instances for guaranteed performance.

Example: Acme Corp case study (hypothetical)

Acme Corp deployed a 24‑GPU rack with four NVLink islands (6 GPUs per island) serving 500 knowledge‑worker desktops running a Cowork‑style agent. They:

• Reserved two islands for exclusive sessions (large LLMs), used MIG for the remaining islands for high concurrency.
• Implemented an NVLink‑aware broker in Go that assigns session tokens and emits billing events to Kafka.
• Introduced a showback dashboard that reduced unnecessary GPU use by 38% in 3 months, because teams could see exact cost per session.

Key metric: average interactive latency fell from 380ms to 90ms after enforcing NVLink affinity for multi‑GPU sessions.

Future directions and predictions (2026–2028)

Expect these trends over the next 24 months:

• NVLink Fusion mainstreaming: More system‑on‑chip and edge silicon will embrace NVLink Fusion semantics, making NVLink affinity scheduling essential both on‑prem and in hybrid clouds.
• Standardized GPU topology APIs: Vendors and open communities will converge on richer topology metadata (beyond nvidia‑smi) for schedulers and orchestrators.
• More granular hardware telemetry: Per‑peer NVLink counters and per‑slice billing will become standard, enabling precise chargebacks for cross‑GPU traffic.
• Security primitives: Attestation and confidential compute for model protection will be integrated into GPU host management stacks.

Plan for these upgrades now: architect with flexible metadata and a broker that can accept richer topology signals later.

Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

• Ignoring NVLink when it matters: If you allocate across islands for multi‑GPU models, you will get worse latency and throughput — benchmark before allowing cross‑island allocation.
• Over‑committing without accounting: Shared modes (MIG, MPS) can hide noisy neighbors. Enforce per‑session caps and run anomaly detection on GPU metrics.
• Poor token management: Long‑lived credentials are an easy security hole. Use ephemeral tokens and attested identities.
• No showback: Without visibility, teams overuse GPUs. Provide clear dashboards and cost controls early.

Checklist: deploy an NVLink‑aware on‑prem GPU pool (practical)

1. Inventory GPUs and save NVLink topology to CMDB.
2. Choose runtime mix: exclusive, MIG, vGPU — write policies for each.
3. Build a Broker that understands NVLink islands and session profiles.
4. Implement ephemeral authentication (OIDC/SPIFFE) and secure tunnels.
5. Integrate DCGM + Prometheus for per‑session telemetry.
6. Deploy showback dashboards and define billing rules.
7. Run a pilot with a small team and iterate on latency and cost targets.

Actionable takeaways

• Treat NVLink islands as scheduling atoms — allocate whole islands for multi‑GPU, low‑latency jobs.
• Start with a Broker service that centralizes policy, tokens, and billing rather than giving desktops direct host access.
• Use MIG and vGPU judiciously for density, but always correlate telemetry with session IDs for fair billing and noise detection.
• Implement showback first, chargeback later to drive adoption and cost discipline.

Conclusion and call to action

Desktop AI agents are here, and many will demand on‑prem GPU access for latency or data control. Designing an NVLink‑aware GPU pooling architecture gives you the performance you need while preserving isolation, security, and predictable costs. Start by mapping your NVLink topology, build a broker that understands affinity and isolation policies, instrument per‑session telemetry for billing, and secure the control plane with ephemeral identities.

Need help assessing your on‑prem GPU footprint, building an NVLink‑aware scheduler, or standing up a secure Broker and billing pipeline? Reach out to the wecloud.pro platform engineering team for a technical audit and a pilot design tailored to your environment.

Related Reading

• From Claude Code to Cowork: Building an Internal Developer Desktop Assistant
• Edge Containers & Low-Latency Architectures for Cloud Testbeds — Evolution and Advanced Strategies (2026)
• Edge Auditability & Decision Planes: An Operational Playbook for Cloud Teams in 2026
• News Brief: EU Data Residency Rules and What Cloud Teams Must Change in 2026
• How to Carry a Hot-Water Bottle in Your Backpack Safely (and Why You Might Want To)
• Budget Travel in 2026: Combine Points, Miles and Market Timing to Stretch Your Trip
• Make Skiing Affordable: Combining Mega Passes with Budget Stays and Deals
• Yoga Teacher PR: How to Build Authority Across Social, Search and AI Answers
• 7 CES Kitchen Gadgets I’d Buy Right Now (and How They’d Change My Cooking)